Middle Buffalo advice
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:09 am
I'd like advice on stretches of the middle buffalo when the water levels are low, especially as compared to the lower buffalo.
I've spent countless weekends on the lower buffalo at low water levels - hwy 14 bridge down to the white river. My main goal is canoe-camping where the loud day-trippers AREN'T, as opposed to finding the perfect water level with great rapids, and I've found that part of the river during low water to be amenable. Even when people say "Oh, it's too low, you'll be miserable!" I'm still able to get by with a little dragging over gravel shoals and paddling the still pools. No biggie.
An example of my tolerance for low water conditions: a few weeks ago I wanted to get some photographs of Skull bluff above Woolum. Everyone said it was too low to float from Mt. Hersey, so I put in at Woolum and went upstream for a mile and a half. It was certainly more of a workout than a leisurely paddle, but I made it to skull bluff in about two hours with all my camping gear and just a bit less sweat than I started the trip with.
I've floated most of the Buffalo below Boxley, but my experience with the middle stretches was mostly years ago and only when the water was perfect. My question is, are there stretches above Woolum that are navigable (similar to the lower buffalo) even when the rain gauge shows very low? That far up river, will I be pulling my canoe over crazy-big rocks rather than the gentle gravel shoals I've encountered during low water below Rush? Unlike the lower buffalo, are there frequent dry stretches (aside from the well-known stretch below Woolum that's known to run underground)?
I guess, in a perfect world, I'd love to hear from someone who's been on both parts of the river during low water and can compare them. Any info or advice would be great!
Thanks,
James
I've spent countless weekends on the lower buffalo at low water levels - hwy 14 bridge down to the white river. My main goal is canoe-camping where the loud day-trippers AREN'T, as opposed to finding the perfect water level with great rapids, and I've found that part of the river during low water to be amenable. Even when people say "Oh, it's too low, you'll be miserable!" I'm still able to get by with a little dragging over gravel shoals and paddling the still pools. No biggie.
An example of my tolerance for low water conditions: a few weeks ago I wanted to get some photographs of Skull bluff above Woolum. Everyone said it was too low to float from Mt. Hersey, so I put in at Woolum and went upstream for a mile and a half. It was certainly more of a workout than a leisurely paddle, but I made it to skull bluff in about two hours with all my camping gear and just a bit less sweat than I started the trip with.
I've floated most of the Buffalo below Boxley, but my experience with the middle stretches was mostly years ago and only when the water was perfect. My question is, are there stretches above Woolum that are navigable (similar to the lower buffalo) even when the rain gauge shows very low? That far up river, will I be pulling my canoe over crazy-big rocks rather than the gentle gravel shoals I've encountered during low water below Rush? Unlike the lower buffalo, are there frequent dry stretches (aside from the well-known stretch below Woolum that's known to run underground)?
I guess, in a perfect world, I'd love to hear from someone who's been on both parts of the river during low water and can compare them. Any info or advice would be great!
Thanks,
James