Good River for a 5 day expedition
Good River for a 5 day expedition
Hi,
I'm Julien Huot From Sherbrooke, Canada. With some of my friends, we want to make an canoe camping expedition during the winter break ( around march 5-9). Do you know a river with RI-II(III) white water for a 5 day expedition in south of USA (Arkansas, Tennessee, South Carolina, and under).
Julien Huot
I'm Julien Huot From Sherbrooke, Canada. With some of my friends, we want to make an canoe camping expedition during the winter break ( around march 5-9). Do you know a river with RI-II(III) white water for a 5 day expedition in south of USA (Arkansas, Tennessee, South Carolina, and under).
Julien Huot
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
For class II-III, try re-posting this on the general page instead of the rec page, which is more I-II. For I-II, you can do the upper Buffalo for a fabulous 5-day trip.
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
Thank you for the suggestion, We will be with 2 rookies (total 6), we want to stay at easy level.
- Cowper
- .....
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:39 am
- Name: Cowper C
- Location: Conway, AR
- Contact:
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
I'm only going to answer for Arkansas; my knowledge of camping rivers in the other states is too weak.
As Kim suggested, the Buffalo would be an excellent choice, but maybe just a bit easier than you were asking for. BUT -
The Buffalo is the only river in Arkansas where you could mount a 5 day expedition; all of our other streams have dams, join a major river like the Arkansas (which has a lock and dam system, no WW) or just go out into the flatlands with no WW after a couple or at most 3 days.
The Buffalo has great scenery and and the translucent blue-green water that was typical of all our Ozark streams in years past (except after rains).
The Buffalo runs its entire length through public land (National River, which means it is part of the US National Parks system), so you'll never have to worry about accidentally camping on somebody's property.
The Buffalo is not "developed", you'll see only an occassional road crossing, and pass a few campgrounds.
You can camp anywhere that suits you; most like to stay on the large gravel bars. Choose one that backs up to a hill so that you have an "escape route" if it rains. While rare, the river is capable of rising 40' in a few hours. Unless the sky is clear blue and you are 100% sure it is not going to rain anywhere within 100 miles, consider carrying your canoe up the gravel bar to a point higher than your tent. (This insures you will be awake BEFORE the canoe floats downstream.)
Watch this thread; our resident "Buffalo river camping expert" Richard will weigh in; I bet if I mention it he will post the lastest version of his spreadsheet summarizing mileages and with links to gages. (But take some of his advice with a grain of salt, unless you think camping should be done with the same level of comfort you expect at a Hilton.)
Buy a book; there are a number of side hikes worth doing, depending on what stretch of river you are on. Also, take time to walk up to the old country store at Gilbert; on a 5 day trip you will almost certainly go by there at some point in your trip. You should also take the time to scramble up the rocks at the "Nars" (the Narrows"). It looks like just another bluff line from the river, but when you get to the top, you'll be glad you did. Hummm - do you see the pattern emerging - "take the time to...". That is the beauty of the Buffalo, taking the time to just immerse yourself in it. Also on the "must hike" list - Hemmed in Hollow, if you launch at Steel Creek. While still in your car, go to Lost Valley and hike the trail there up to the waterfall; take flashlights and go into the cave and make your way back to an underground waterfall (no hard-core caving experience is needed).
Water levels are rain-dependent, but March should provide a good window. Don't get "locked in" on exactly which stretch you will do, stay flexible so that you can make your final decision when you arrive and see what the level is and what rain is in the forecast. If there is enough water, you should start at Steel Creek; but if there is not, you can start lower down, and continue your trip all the way to the White River.
You might also want to look into the Current River, Eleven Point, or the Jacks Fork, in southern Missouri. In summer, they become pretty "wild" on weekends, but in March they might provide a good opportunity for you. There would also be some options like, 3 days on the Buffalo, 3 days on the Current, etc, which could come into play if you are willing to consider two shorter expeditions instead of one long one.
For my money, I don't think you could beat a 5 day trip on the Buffalo.
As Kim suggested, the Buffalo would be an excellent choice, but maybe just a bit easier than you were asking for. BUT -
The Buffalo is the only river in Arkansas where you could mount a 5 day expedition; all of our other streams have dams, join a major river like the Arkansas (which has a lock and dam system, no WW) or just go out into the flatlands with no WW after a couple or at most 3 days.
The Buffalo has great scenery and and the translucent blue-green water that was typical of all our Ozark streams in years past (except after rains).
The Buffalo runs its entire length through public land (National River, which means it is part of the US National Parks system), so you'll never have to worry about accidentally camping on somebody's property.
The Buffalo is not "developed", you'll see only an occassional road crossing, and pass a few campgrounds.
You can camp anywhere that suits you; most like to stay on the large gravel bars. Choose one that backs up to a hill so that you have an "escape route" if it rains. While rare, the river is capable of rising 40' in a few hours. Unless the sky is clear blue and you are 100% sure it is not going to rain anywhere within 100 miles, consider carrying your canoe up the gravel bar to a point higher than your tent. (This insures you will be awake BEFORE the canoe floats downstream.)
Watch this thread; our resident "Buffalo river camping expert" Richard will weigh in; I bet if I mention it he will post the lastest version of his spreadsheet summarizing mileages and with links to gages. (But take some of his advice with a grain of salt, unless you think camping should be done with the same level of comfort you expect at a Hilton.)
Buy a book; there are a number of side hikes worth doing, depending on what stretch of river you are on. Also, take time to walk up to the old country store at Gilbert; on a 5 day trip you will almost certainly go by there at some point in your trip. You should also take the time to scramble up the rocks at the "Nars" (the Narrows"). It looks like just another bluff line from the river, but when you get to the top, you'll be glad you did. Hummm - do you see the pattern emerging - "take the time to...". That is the beauty of the Buffalo, taking the time to just immerse yourself in it. Also on the "must hike" list - Hemmed in Hollow, if you launch at Steel Creek. While still in your car, go to Lost Valley and hike the trail there up to the waterfall; take flashlights and go into the cave and make your way back to an underground waterfall (no hard-core caving experience is needed).
Water levels are rain-dependent, but March should provide a good window. Don't get "locked in" on exactly which stretch you will do, stay flexible so that you can make your final decision when you arrive and see what the level is and what rain is in the forecast. If there is enough water, you should start at Steel Creek; but if there is not, you can start lower down, and continue your trip all the way to the White River.
You might also want to look into the Current River, Eleven Point, or the Jacks Fork, in southern Missouri. In summer, they become pretty "wild" on weekends, but in March they might provide a good opportunity for you. There would also be some options like, 3 days on the Buffalo, 3 days on the Current, etc, which could come into play if you are willing to consider two shorter expeditions instead of one long one.
For my money, I don't think you could beat a 5 day trip on the Buffalo.
Trash: Get a little every time you go!
-
- .
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:21 am
- Name: Woody
- Location: Redfield
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
What Cowper said..."ditto"
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
Plus two for Cowper. FWIW I just returned tonight from a three day trip on the Current and would highly recommend it. Lots of stuff to see on and off the water, as is the case with the Buffalo.
You come too.
Robert Frost
Robert Frost
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
another Buffalo vote. first National River, and theres 100+ miles to work with. new paddlers can handle it.
2nd place would be the Mulberry if you want to raise the whitewater level a notch. about 40 miles to work with there.
2nd place would be the Mulberry if you want to raise the whitewater level a notch. about 40 miles to work with there.
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
Last April, I assisted six recreation students from Algonquin College- Pembroke. They floated the Current and loved it. As much as I like the Buffalo, I would suggest the Current because it is less challenging and has a good flow. As mentioned, much to see. Keep in mind that March 5-9 still has the potential for winter weather and you should be prepared for daytime wind chills and night time temps below 0ºC. We have had an unusually mild winter and if that holds then the Current and Buffalo would be great. But don't count on it. For the dates you plan to float you will basically have either river to yourself. I would contact the national park service and let them know what your itinerary is so they can be on the lookout for you in case there is an emergency.
I wish I was going with you. I have a conflicting schedule that week.
If you want warmer temps I would suggest Florida, Georgia, South Carolina or Texas. I am not familiar with any of them.
Useful sites for the Buffalo and Current Rivers
http://www.nps.gov/buff/index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.nps.gov/ozar/index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here are the spreadsheets.
[attachment=1]Buffalo River 2011-12-04.xls[/attachment]
[attachment=0]Current River Level Guidelines - Weather - GPS vs2011-10-30.xlsx[/attachment]
I wish I was going with you. I have a conflicting schedule that week.
If you want warmer temps I would suggest Florida, Georgia, South Carolina or Texas. I am not familiar with any of them.
Useful sites for the Buffalo and Current Rivers
http://www.nps.gov/buff/index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.nps.gov/ozar/index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here are the spreadsheets.
[attachment=1]Buffalo River 2011-12-04.xls[/attachment]
[attachment=0]Current River Level Guidelines - Weather - GPS vs2011-10-30.xlsx[/attachment]
- Attachments
-
- Current River Level Guidelines - Weather - GPS vs2011-10-30.xlsx
- (33.43 KiB) Downloaded 69 times
-
- Buffalo River 2011-12-04.xls
- (920 KiB) Downloaded 79 times
We are all afflicted with Cognitive Dissonance. The greater our religious, social, financial or political affiliation, the greater the affliction. We hear what we want to hear. We believe what we want to believe. Truth becomes irrelevant.
Re: Good River for a 5 day expedition
The only thing I'd add is that assuming your group can navigate class II+ water, if you happen to catch the river high enough, consider starting your paddling trip at Boxley. Boxley to Steel Cr is an easy day of paddling (7.5 mi of pretty fast class 2), and you can pull over above Clark Cr. and hike across the field (which is often full of Elk) and up to the Lost Valley trail for a spectacular 2 mile round-trip hike (hiking from the river will add another 1.5 miles or so round-trip).
That's only if the water is really going good (should be only inches of airspace at the Ponca low-water bridge for a good run from Boxley). But even if the water is low, you should still seek out the hike at Lost Valley. You will not be disappointed.
- Fish
That's only if the water is really going good (should be only inches of airspace at the Ponca low-water bridge for a good run from Boxley). But even if the water is low, you should still seek out the hike at Lost Valley. You will not be disappointed.
- Fish
Social Media
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests