Boxley (not hailstone, just hwy 21 down)- Kyle's or Mulberry

Open Discussion
Post Reply
       
GloryDaze
.
.
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:46 pm
Name: Ken

Boxley (not hailstone, just hwy 21 down)- Kyle's or Mulberry

Post by GloryDaze » Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:04 am

If all things are equal (meaning floating conditions and water levels- let's say 3-3.5 at Turner Bend on the Mulbery and 4-4.5 on the upper Buffalo at Ponca) would you suggest going to the Mulberry or the Upper Buffalo??

Just curious for your opinions??

Owl
....
....
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: EM25tg

Re: Boxley (not hailstone, just hwy 21 down)- Kyle's or Mulberry

Post by Owl » Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:23 am

Depends on what you're looking for.

The Buffalo from Ponca to Kyles has some of the best scenery in the state but not too many rapids or surf spots.

The upper Mulberry (Wolf Pen to Byrds) is less scenic (but still very nice) and has more rapids, eddies to catch, surf spots, etc.

GloryDaze
.
.
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:46 pm
Name: Ken

Re: Boxley (not hailstone, just hwy 21 down)- Kyle's or Mulberry

Post by GloryDaze » Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:37 am

Sorry- should have been more specific: I definitely want some rapids, but nothing that is too over-demanding... I've done the Mulberry at 2.5 and it was pretty fun. I've done the Upper Buffalo with 20" of air space and it was beautiful and fun as well.

I'm not entry level, but am by no means an expert-- On a scale of 1-5, I would say I'm in the 2-2.5 range of skill level.

It looks like if I get to go this weekend, both would have quite a bit more water than the last time I went- just trying to decide which I might enjoy better.

Post Reply

Social Media

       

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 0 guests