Cows are killing the planet!!

[ljasonl]

Global Warming Groupthink:

Typical. Insults and no science.

[Drifter]

The above referenced post was directed at no one in particular. However, if the shoe fits - wear it.

Pardon me, but I provided links to lots of science. Go back through the thread and read the posts. Click on the links; there you will find the science you accuse me of not providing.

There are two sides to this issue; not just the one side you are promoting. Let the people think and decide for themselves.

Edit:

I read the "easy to read and understand" article on global warming featured in Skeptic magazine and referenced in the last post on page one of this thread.

Here is an article from the very same magazine debunking the referenced article.

http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/fea ... elief.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

“He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.”

— John McCarthy

"This point is so important that it bears a simple illustration to make it very clear. Suppose I had a computer model of common arithmetic that said 2+2=5±0.1. Every time I ran the model, there was a 68% chance that the result of 2+2 would be within 0.1 unit of 5. My shaded region would be ±0.1 unit wide. If 40 research groups had 40 slightly different computer models of arithmetic that gave similar results, we could all congratulate ourselves on a consensus. Suppose that after much work, we improved our models so that they gave 2+2=5±0.01. We could then claim our models were 10 times better than before. But they’d all be exactly as wrong as before, too, because exact arithmetic proves that 2+2=4. This example illustrates the critical difference between precision and accuracy."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'How can I help it?' he blubbered. 'How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two
are four.'
'Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all
of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.'

-George Orwell 1984

[coolhand]

If there is Global warming then we just need to plant more trees. Hell we need to plant more trees any way!!!!! For every tree that I have ever destroyed I have tryed my hardest to plant 2 in it's place some where else that is. Trees cut down on CO2, but not methane. There is ways to capture it and use it as a fuel. There are some plants in the U.S. that use methane to produce electricity to power their plant. For enstance Subaru. If coal plants produce alot of CO2, a way to eliminate so much use of coal for generating electricity is to capture all this wasted methane if possible. Because there are all the landfills that have not had the methane captured that they produce. There can be bad aspects found to just about everything if you look hard enough.