NOAA

Open Discussion
Post Reply
       
User avatar
Richard
.....
.....
Posts: 1428
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:41 am
Location: Conway, AR

NOAA

Post by Richard » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:38 pm

Hmmmm? Do you suppose the left and right hands don't see eye to eye?

http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/hydrogra ... gage=sjoa4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/p120i12.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
We are all afflicted with Cognitive Dissonance. The greater our religious, social, financial or political affiliation, the greater the affliction. We hear what we want to hear. We believe what we want to believe. Truth becomes irrelevant.

User avatar
paddledog
.....
.....
Posts: 896
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: behind the camera
Contact:

Re: NOAA

Post by paddledog » Mon Mar 19, 2012 5:56 am

How can you believe a site that says Turner bend is on the Buffalo....

46.5 CREST OF APRIL 25 2004 WAS 46.51 FEET. PRIMARY IMPACTS ARE TO THE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE...SUCH AS TURNER BEND CAMPGROUND NEAR U. S. HIGHWAY 65. RIVER IS SWIFT AND DANGEROUS AND MAY BE CARRYING A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF DEBRIS. FLOATING AND OTHER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES ON AND ALONG THE RIVER SHOULD BE AVOIDED.

I know it's true.... I read it on the internet.......
Fighting for peace........
Isn't that like screaming for quiet?

Image
http://www.Paddledog.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Richard
.....
.....
Posts: 1428
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:41 am
Location: Conway, AR

Re: NOAA

Post by Richard » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:58 am

I saw that also . . . but hey, its gotta be true. Its on the internet.
We are all afflicted with Cognitive Dissonance. The greater our religious, social, financial or political affiliation, the greater the affliction. We hear what we want to hear. We believe what we want to believe. Truth becomes irrelevant.

User avatar
okieboater
.....
.....
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 9:21 pm
Name: David L. Reid
Location: Jenks, Oklahoma

Re: NOAA

Post by okieboater » Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:36 pm

Boyz, before this rain event ends, my bet is lots of things get re arranged by the flood that is sure to come

What ever is upstream is gonna be some where waaay down stream


Not much surprises me these days
Okieboater AKA Dave Reid

We are not sure when childhood ends and adulthood begins.

We are sure that when retirement begins, childhood restarts

User avatar
Renee H
.....
.....
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 9:48 pm
Location: Little Rock, AR

Re: NOAA

Post by Renee H » Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:44 pm

I am betting they meant to say "Tyler Bend Campground" as it is off Hwy 65.

User avatar
Richard
.....
.....
Posts: 1428
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:41 am
Location: Conway, AR

Re: NOAA

Post by Richard » Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:32 pm

This one shows the river continuing to drop. That just aint gonna happen.
http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/hydrogra ... ,1,1,1,1,1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
We are all afflicted with Cognitive Dissonance. The greater our religious, social, financial or political affiliation, the greater the affliction. We hear what we want to hear. We believe what we want to believe. Truth becomes irrelevant.

User avatar
okieboater
.....
.....
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 9:21 pm
Name: David L. Reid
Location: Jenks, Oklahoma

Re: NOAA

Post by okieboater » Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:58 pm

Patience Friend Richard,

The spirits work in strange and wondrous ways!
Okieboater AKA Dave Reid

We are not sure when childhood ends and adulthood begins.

We are sure that when retirement begins, childhood restarts

User avatar
Cowper
.....
.....
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:39 am
Name: Cowper C
Location: Conway, AR
Contact:

Re: NOAA

Post by Cowper » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:40 pm

I think the level prediction might give us insight into how the software works. I suppose it is possible they factor in rainfall; but it seems more likely that this is just set up to predict levels based on what upstream gages are telling them. If that is the model, then we won't see a predicted rise at St. Joe, until sometime after the Upper Buffalo and/or tributary gages like Richland start showing a rise.

I sent them a comment on the name swap; we'll see if they get it forwarded to the right webmaster for correction.
Trash: Get a little every time you go!

Post Reply

Social Media

       

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests