Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Open Discussion
User avatar
Dave Thomas
....
....
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:29 am
Name: Dave Thomas
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by Dave Thomas » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:42 pm

I see your point Howard and Spanke. Big Eddy is a sweet place to camp by the water, get rowdy, and shoot pistolas in the air. Every year it gets a little harder to find places that allow us to exercise the second amendment.
They should propose a third access point option that's further downstream so folks could make a float trip from Turner Bend on down.
Paddle on,
Dave Thomas
dthomas@mohawkcanoes.com

User avatar
A Savage spanke
.....
.....
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Clarksville Arkansas

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by A Savage spanke » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:36 am

You mean bryds cabin?
It could be worse, it could stop raining
call to paddle 479.518.0017

User avatar
Dave Thomas
....
....
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:29 am
Name: Dave Thomas
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by Dave Thomas » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:20 pm

A Savage spanke wrote:You mean bryds cabin?
No. The Byrd's Cabin is a little over 1.5 mile downstream from Turner Bend...isn't that right? So maybe even further down from that. What would be the opposition to an access point at Cains Bluff? I'd sure like some gravel put on the road into there!
Paddle on,
Dave Thomas
dthomas@mohawkcanoes.com

User avatar
A Savage spanke
.....
.....
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Clarksville Arkansas

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by A Savage spanke » Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:25 pm

Oh a take-out downstream if you put in at turner bend. Gotcha, I thought you meant another access point to take the load off turner bend. In this case, Cambells Cemetery is downstream, and can act as a takeout.
It could be worse, it could stop raining
call to paddle 479.518.0017

User avatar
GN YAKN
....
....
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:51 am

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by GN YAKN » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:45 am

After giving this request for input some serious consideration I'm going to write the Forest Service and suggest they pursue the first option with the access closest to Hwy 23.

Probably one of the most widely used sections of the river is the Redding to Turner Bend section. There are two options for taking out at Turner Bend, one is at Turner Bend on river left and the other is on river right at what is referred to locally as Jamestown, I believe. Both are on private property and access availability is subject to the owner's approval.

An additional public access on river right at Hwy 23 would be, IMO, the most used of the two options. The section from Hwy 23 to Big Eddy is not that great and is now clogged with trees and can be technical for beginners.

I'm writing to suggest the FS pursue the first option with the day use area on river right at Hwy 23 and encourage others to give it some thought and also select an option and voice their interest to the FS.

Dave
Dave Robertson

"Endeavor to persevere." And when we had thought about it long enough, we declared war on the Union.....
Chief Dan George in The Outlaw Josey Wales 1976 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRX6hSGeZs4

User avatar
Michele Jackson
...
...
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Lavaca, AR

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by Michele Jackson » Wed Sep 29, 2010 5:59 am

Dave - I agree with your assessment completely and have mailed my comments to the FS.

User avatar
Dave Thomas
....
....
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:29 am
Name: Dave Thomas
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by Dave Thomas » Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:54 pm

I don't believe that the Forest Service is going to add a third option to the list so back to the two options of 'Big Eddy' and the 'small game area'. My original vote was for Big Eddy. However after MUCH thought and after waiting to see if another option would be added, I'll be calling the Forest Service tomorrow with my vote/comment for the new access point to be placed at the small game area which is closer to the Hwy. 23 bridge than Big Eddy.
Last edited by Dave Thomas on Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:12 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Paddle on,
Dave Thomas
dthomas@mohawkcanoes.com

User avatar
Dave Thomas
....
....
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:29 am
Name: Dave Thomas
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by Dave Thomas » Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:09 pm

The deadline for comments is October 10, 2010. There are several ways to comment:

1) Mail your completed comment form, found on page 4 of this document http://www.fs.fed.us/oonf/ozark/project ... letter.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; , to Jobi Brown at 1803 North 18th Street, Ozark, AR 72949.

2) Call the Boston Mountain Ranger District at 479-667-2191 or TTY 479-667-1931.

3) Email your comments to the address: comments-southern-ozark-stfrancis-bostonmtn@fs.fed.us.
Paddle on,
Dave Thomas
dthomas@mohawkcanoes.com

User avatar
Dave Thomas
....
....
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:29 am
Name: Dave Thomas
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Forest Service assessment and access plan for Mulberry

Post by Dave Thomas » Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:47 pm

The Forest Service is only taking comments concerning the Mulberry River access points until October 10,2010. Give Jobi Brown a call at 479-667-2191 and let your comment count!
Paddle on,
Dave Thomas
dthomas@mohawkcanoes.com

Post Reply

Social Media

       

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests